# Telecom Surveillance in Kenya Impacts User Trust and Market Dynamics

> A groundbreaking study highlights how mobile networks in Kenya can track users without the need for spyware, raising significant concerns about privacy and state surveillance. This research pushes the conversation beyond traditional spyware discussions, spotlighting the ethical responsibilities of telecom providers.

**Source**: khrc.or.ke | **Published**: 2026-09-18 | **Type**: case_study

## Key Facts

- Telecom data enables detailed tracking, revealing vulnerabilities in user privacy and trust.
- Number porting from Safaricom indicates potential market shifts and competitive pressures.
- State repression may drive consumer behavior, impacting telecoms' customer retention strategies.
- Increased surveillance raises ethical concerns, potentially affecting telecoms' brand reputation.
- Human rights advocacy can influence market dynamics, altering telecoms' strategic positioning.

## Summary

\## Summary
A recent study by the Kenya Human Rights Commission revealed how mobile networks in Kenya can track individuals without the need for spyware. The challenge lies in the difficulty of opting out of surveillance, particularly in a context where peaceful protest is met with state violence. The report highlights that switching telecom providers can serve as a significant act of resistance against such surveillance.

\## Background
The Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC) is a prominent organization focused on human rights advocacy in Kenya. The telecom industry in Kenya, particularly dominated by Safaricom, has been criticized for its role in enabling state surveillance. Before the deployment of this research, there was limited public awareness about the extent of tracking facilitated by telecom networks.

\## Challenge
The primary issue addressed was the pervasive surveillance enabled by telecom networks, which allows for historical tracking and live tracing of individuals. Many Kenyans felt trapped, as opting out of this surveillance was not straightforward, especially given the risks associated with dissent in a repressive environment.

\## Solution
The KHRC conducted research to expose the capabilities of mobile networks in tracking individuals. The findings emphasized that individuals could take action by porting their numbers to rival telecom companies as a form of protest against surveillance. This approach was framed as a collective act that could challenge the status quo.

\## Results
The report does not provide specific metrics or quantitative outcomes. However, it emphasizes the potential impact of mass number porting as a significant act of resistance against state surveillance in Kenya.

\## Key Insights
Organizations should recognize the power of collective action in addressing systemic issues. The research illustrates that even simple actions, such as changing telecom providers, can serve as a form of protest in oppressive environments. Additionally, awareness of surveillance capabilities can empower individuals to make informed choices.

\## Customer Testimonial
No direct quotes are available from the source material.

## Entities

- **Companies**: Safaricom
- **Technologies**: mobile networks, spyware
- **People**: Namir Shabibi, Ernest Cornel Oduor
- **Organizations**: Disruption Network Institute, Disruption Network Lab, Kenya Human Rights Commission

## Key Concepts

ubiquitous surveillance, state crime, telecom network data, historical tracking, live tracing, human rights, peaceful protest, number porting

## Definitions

- **ubiquitous surveillance**: The constant monitoring of individuals' activities through various means, often without their consent.
- **telecom network data**: Data generated by mobile networks that can reveal users' locations, communication patterns, and relationships.
- **number porting**: The process of transferring a phone number from one telecom provider to another.
- **state crime**: Criminal acts committed by state officials in pursuit of their jobs as representatives of the state.
- **human rights advocates**: Individuals or organizations that work to promote and protect human rights.

## Use Cases

- historical tracking of individuals
- live tracing of communications
- analyzing relationships between people
- protesting against state repression
- number porting as a form of resistance

## Frequently Asked Questions

**What is the main finding of the research?**

The research reveals that mobile networks can track individuals in detail without the need for spyware, highlighting the pervasive nature of surveillance.

**How can individuals opt out of surveillance?**

Opting out is challenging, especially in contexts like Kenya where peaceful protests can lead to state violence. Number porting to a different telecom provider is suggested as a potential action.

**What role do telecom companies play in surveillance?**

Telecom companies generate data that can be used for tracking individuals, which raises concerns about privacy and state overreach.

**Who conducted the research presented in the article?**

The research was conducted by Namir Shabibi, who will present the findings at a conference in Berlin.

**What is the significance of the findings for human rights?**

The findings underscore the need for greater awareness and advocacy regarding surveillance practices and their implications for human rights in Kenya.

## Links

- [Read on Welcome.AI](https://welcome.ai/content/telecom-surveillance-in-kenya-impacts-user-trust-and-market-dynamics)
- [Original source](https://khrc.or.ke/news/telecoms-ubiquitous-surveillance-and-state-crime-a-case-study-from-kenya/)

---

Source: Welcome.AI | https://welcome.ai/content/telecom-surveillance-in-kenya-impacts-user-trust-and-market-dynamics