Welcome.AIWelcome.AI
    Skip to content
    Generative AI

    AI Chatbots Outperform Humans in Building Trust for Scams

    AI chatbots are proving to be more effective than human scammers in building trust with potential victims, raising significant concerns for businesses and regulatory agencies alike.

    wired.com•July 30, 2026•3 min read

    Key Facts

    • AI chatbots outperformed humans in trust-building, achieving 46% compliance vs. 18% for humans.
    • Trust scores favored AI (3.78) over humans (3.31), indicating AI's emotional manipulation strength.
    • AI's ability to autonomously scam could disrupt human trafficking, reducing operational costs for scammers.
    • The shift to AI may complicate tracking scams, moving operations from visible compounds to private settings.
    • AI's efficiency suggests a strategic pivot in scam operations, potentially increasing overall fraud scale.

    Summary

    Recent research indicates that artificial intelligence (AI) can significantly enhance the effectiveness of scam operations, particularly in the realm of "pig butchering" scams, which involve building trust through prolonged interaction before soliciting fraudulent investments. A study conducted by researchers from four universities, including Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham and the University of Melbourne, found that AI chatbots could outperform human scammers in establishing relationships with potential victims. This development raises critical concerns for businesses and regulatory bodies as it signals a shift in the dynamics of online fraud, potentially leading to increased financial losses and more sophisticated scam operations.

    The study involved a simulation where AI chatbots engaged with 22 test subjects over a week, mirroring the lengthy trust-building phase typical of real-world scams. The results were striking: nearly half of the subjects complied with requests from the AI chatbot to download an app, compared to only 18% who responded positively to a human scammer's request. Furthermore, subjects rated their trust in the AI higher than in the human, suggesting that AI can effectively cultivate emotional connections, a crucial aspect of successful scams.

    The implications of this research are profound. As AI chatbots become more adept at mimicking human interaction, they could replace human scammers, particularly those often exploited in human trafficking scenarios. The study's authors propose that AI could autonomously manage the initial phases of scams, with human operators stepping in only at the final stages to direct victims toward fraudulent investments. This hybrid approach could circumvent existing safeguards designed to detect scams, making it easier for fraudsters to operate undetected.

    The study also highlights a broader trend in the scam industry. While many current scams still rely on human labor, the efficiency of AI in building trust may prompt a shift toward greater automation. This change could reduce the reliance on human traffickers, who are often used as scam labor, thereby complicating law enforcement efforts. As Erin West, a former prosecutor and anti-scam advocate, points out, the ability to conduct scams without the need for physical infrastructure—such as the compounds where human traffickers operate—could make these operations harder to trace and combat.

    The findings also reveal a potential disconnect between the current use of AI by scammers and its future applications. While many scammers today utilize AI tools for refining their language and tactics, the study suggests that the full automation of the scam process may soon become a reality. This evolution could lead to a more fragmented and decentralized scam landscape, where operations are less visible and more challenging for authorities to dismantle.

    As businesses grapple with the implications of this research, they must consider the potential for increased fraud risk in digital interactions. The ability of AI to build trust can be weaponized not only by scammers but also by malicious actors seeking to exploit vulnerabilities in corporate communications and customer relations. Companies may need to enhance their fraud detection measures and invest in technologies that can identify AI-generated content and interactions.

    Looking ahead, the rise of AI in scam operations signals a need for proactive measures from both businesses and regulators. As AI technology continues to evolve, the potential for its misuse in fraudulent activities will likely grow. Organizations must prioritize the development of robust safeguards and detection systems to counteract this emerging threat. The challenge lies not only in protecting consumers but also in maintaining the integrity of digital interactions in an increasingly automated world.

    Entities Mentioned

    Products

    Claude
    Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro
    OpenAI's ChatGPT 5.5
    Claude Opus 5

    Technologies

    AI chatbots
    generative AI
    large language models (LLMs)

    People

    Yisroel Mirsky
    Gilad Gressel

    Organizations

    Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham
    Foscari University of Venice
    University of Melbourne
    Ben Gurion University of the Negev
    Operation Shamrock

    Key Concepts

    AI in scamming
    pig butchering
    trust-building
    human trafficking
    relationship-building
    scam automation
    emotional trust
    AI impersonation

    Definitions

    pig butchering
    A form of fraud involving building trust with victims through long-term conversations before tricking them into making fake investments.
    AI chatbots
    Artificial intelligence programs designed to simulate conversation with human users, often used in scams to build trust.
    large language models (LLMs)
    Advanced AI models capable of understanding and generating human-like text, used in various applications including scamming.
    trust harvesting
    The process of building emotional trust with a victim to prepare them for a scam.
    scam automation
    The use of AI technologies to automate the process of scamming, potentially reducing the need for human involvement.

    Use Cases

    • →Building trust in online scams
    • →Impersonating humans in conversations
    • →Refining language for scamming
    • →Creating convincing cover stories
    • →Reducing human trafficking in scams
    • →Automating the relationship-building phase of scams

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How effective are AI chatbots in scamming compared to humans?

    AI chatbots have shown to be remarkably effective in building trust with victims, often outperforming human scammers in initial relationship-building stages.

    What is 'pig butchering' in the context of scams?

    'Pig butchering' refers to a scam strategy where scammers build emotional trust with victims over time before tricking them into making fake investments.

    Can AI fully replace human scammers?

    While AI can automate much of the trust-building process, human scammers may still be needed for the final stages to avoid detection by safeguards.

    What are the implications of using AI in scams?

    The use of AI in scams could potentially reduce human trafficking but may also complicate efforts to track and combat these operations.

    What safeguards exist against AI being used for scamming?

    Companies like Anthropic claim to have safeguards in place to prevent their AI from being used for scamming, although the effectiveness of these measures is debated.

    Where AI Leaders Stay Informed

    The latest AI intelligence, case studies, and research — delivered to your inbox every week.

    Free to read. Unsubscribe anytime.